Well, we got a reply...
Dear Mr & Mrs Harvey, (Good start...
we're not married and my surname is not Harvey)
RE: Complaint – Stamford Christmas Festival
2013
Your complaint received on 31 October 2013
was examined by a complaints panel on Tuesday 05 November and its findings are
as follows:
{redacted}
On examining all the paperwork and
associated correspondence relating to your complaint, no reference to the
alleged free offer made by Alison Hawley Smith could be traced, other than the
copy you forwarded from Alison Hawley Smith which was dated 31 October 2013.
Stamford Town Council has identified Alison
Hawley Smith’s communication to Reloved Vintage of 13 December 2012 re-stating
the responsibilities of all traders participating in the 2012 Christmas
Festival with a reminder of the requirement to hold valid insurance. As
per the Terms & Conditions of the (signed) contract no refund should have
been made; however it is evident that a full refund of £75 was made by bank
transfer on 20 December 2012 by Alison Hawley Smith as an unauthorized
‘goodwill gesture’.
The delay you experienced in obtaining a
response is regrettable but was unavoidable and we wholeheartedly apologise for
any inconvenience. However, such matters must necessarily follow due
process, which I am sure you can well appreciate.
Stamford Town Council does not accept any
liability in this matter. However, the offer of a 50% discount on the cost of a
stall at the 2013 Christmas Festival remains and Stamford Town Council will
ensure that a stall is held available for you until 15th November latest should
you wish to take up the offer.
I trust that you find the above answers the
points raised.
Yours sincerely
Councillor Brian C. Sumner
Mayor of Stamford
Copy to: Cllr Mrs S Sandall, Chairman of
Events Committee
So, they've basically said: "Even though you say you were offered a free stall, and the organiser says you were offered a free stall, we don't believe you were offered a free stall."
They also think that taking three weeks to reply to an email, or return a phone call is "unavoidable".
Ladies and gentlemen, Stamford Town Council, where common courtesy is an alien concept.
In accordance with the complaints procedure detailed at: http://www. stamfordtowncouncil.co.uk/wp- content/uploads/2012/02/2012- STC-Complaint-Procedure1.pdf
We should not have had to go through all of this in order to get what was promised to us. We should not have had to email Ali Hawley-Smith ourselves to ask her for confirmation of the offer of a free stall. You should have done this the very moment, on 11 September 2013, that we asked you about the free stall.
The fact that you still refuse to budge on this and quote
only the paperwork you have seen, suggests you think that both Ali and
ourselves are lying.
Your heel-digging, back-covering and time-wasting stinks of stubbornness.
We would really, really, really appreciate your support. You can help us to make sure justice is done. On behalf of all small traders who have to deal with witless, feckless, self-serving councils, please email townhall@stamfordtowncouncil.gov.uk to show your support.
You can copy and paste the text below if you like:
We fully support Reloved Vintage's appeal against your ridiculous decision to not honour the offer of a free stall at the 2013 Christmas Market. We urge you to make the right decision and give Reloved Vintage a stall, free of charge, at the 2014 Stamford Christmas Market.
You can copy and paste the text below if you like:
We fully support Reloved Vintage's appeal against your ridiculous decision to not honour the offer of a free stall at the 2013 Christmas Market. We urge you to make the right decision and give Reloved Vintage a stall, free of charge, at the 2014 Stamford Christmas Market.
Fully support you on this...
ReplyDeleteLetter below emailed...
Dear Sir or Madam...
I fully support Jack Thorpe and Laura Harvey of 'Reloved Vintage,' and their appeal against your ill decision NOT to honour the offer of a free stall at the 2013 Christmas Market which was promised to them by Ali Hawley-Smith.
To allow them to participate is completely within the town council's control and it is quite unjust and mean-spirited you would renege on an offer that was already made to them. The mere providing them their free stall is not something that would in anyway compromise the event, but only add and enrich and diversify the already present assembled group. Therefore I cannot understand the council's reluctance not to give them what they are due.
As a member of the Stamford community, all of us should be supporting independent small businesses, traders, and artisans, as it is people like this that enrich our community.
I urge you to make the right decision and give 'Reloved Vintage' their stall (as promised, at no cost) at the 2014 Stamford Christmas Market.
Sincerely,
D. Drew
Thanks. It really means a lot that you have taken the time to write in our defence x
ReplyDelete